Ruby Programming Training Classes in Lodi, California
Learn Ruby Programming in Lodi, California and surrounding areas via our hands-on, expert led courses. All of our classes either are offered on an onsite, online or public instructor led basis. Here is a list of our current Ruby Programming related training offerings in Lodi, California: Ruby Programming Training
| Ruby on Rails Training/Class | 22 August, 2024 - 23 August, 2024 | $790 |  |
| Ruby Programming Training/Class | 19 August, 2024 - 21 August, 2024 | $1090 | |
Ruby Programming Training Catalog
Course Directory [training on all levels]
- .NET Classes
- Agile/Scrum Classes
- Ajax Classes
- Android and iPhone Programming Classes
- Blaze Advisor Classes
- C Programming Classes
- C# Programming Classes
- C++ Programming Classes
- Cisco Classes
- Cloud Classes
- CompTIA Classes
- Crystal Reports Classes
- Design Patterns Classes
- DevOps Classes
- Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Classes
- Git, Jira, Wicket, Gradle, Tableau Classes
- IBM Classes
- Java Programming Classes
- JBoss Administration Classes
- JUnit, TDD, CPTC, Web Penetration Classes
- Linux Unix Classes
- Machine Learning Classes
- Microsoft Classes
- Microsoft Development Classes
- Microsoft SQL Server Classes
- Microsoft Team Foundation Server Classes
- Microsoft Windows Server Classes
- Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Classes
- Perl Programming Classes
- Python Programming Classes
- Ruby Programming Classes
- Security Classes
- SharePoint Classes
- SOA Classes
- Tcl, Awk, Bash, Shell Classes
- UML Classes
- VMWare Classes
- Web Development Classes
- Web Services Classes
- Weblogic Administration Classes
- XML Classes
- Ruby on Rails
22 August, 2024 - 23 August, 2024 - Object-Oriented Programming in C# Rev. 6.1
24 June, 2024 - 28 June, 2024 - Ruby Programming
19 August, 2024 - 21 August, 2024 - RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX AUTOMATION WITH ANSIBLE
3 June, 2024 - 6 June, 2024 - DOCKER WITH KUBERNETES ADMINISTRATION
6 May, 2024 - 10 May, 2024 - See our complete public course listing
Blog Entries publications that: entertain, make you think, offer insight
Communication is one of the main objectives that an organization needs to have in place to stay efficient and productive. A breakdown in accurate and efficient communication between departments at any point in the organization can result in conflict or loss of business. Sadly, the efficiency between different departments in an organization becomes most evident when communication breaks down. As an example, David Grossman reported in “The Cost of Poor Communications” that a survey of 400 companies with 100,000 employees each cited an average loss per company of $62.4 million per year because of inadequate communication to and between employees.
With the dawning of the big-data era and the global competition that Machine Learning algorithms has sparked, it’s more vital than ever for companies of all sizes to prioritize departmental communication mishaps. Perhaps, today, as a result of the many emerging markets, the most essential of these connections are between IT and the business units. CMO’s and CIO’s are becoming natural partners in the sense that CMO’s, in order to capture revenue opportunities, are expected to master not just the art of strategy and creativity but also the science of analytics. The CIO, on the other hand, is accountable for using technical groundwork to enable and accelerate revenue growth. Since business and technology people speak very different languages, there’s a need on both sides to start sharing the vocabulary or understanding of what is expected in order to avoid gridlock.
In the McKinsey article, Getting the CMO and CIO to work as partners, the author speaks to five prerequisite steps that the CMO and the CIO can take in order to be successful in their new roles.
--- Be clear on decision governance
Teams should define when decisions are needed, what must be decided, and who is responsible for making them.
Python and Ruby, each with roots going back into the 1990s, are two of the most popular interpreted programming languages today. Ruby is most widely known as the language in which the ubiquitous Ruby on Rails web application framework is written, but it also has legions of fans that use it for things that have nothing to do with the web. Python is a big hit in the numerical and scientific computing communities at the present time, rapidly displacing such longtime stalwarts as R when it comes to these applications. It too, however, is also put to a myriad of other uses, and the two languages probably vie for the title when it comes to how flexible their users find them.
A Matter of Personality...
That isn't to say that there aren't some major, immediately noticeable, differences between the two programming tongues. Ruby is famous for its flexibility and eagerness to please; it is seen by many as a cleaned-up continuation of Perl's "Do What I Mean" philosophy, whereby the interpreter does its best to figure out the meaning of evening non-canonical syntactic constructs. In fact, the language's creator, Yukihiro Matsumoto, chose his brainchild's name in homage to that earlier language's gemstone-inspired moniker.
Python, on the other hand, takes a very different tact. In a famous Python Enhancement Proposal called "The Zen of Python," longtime Pythonista Tim Peters declared it to be preferable that there should only be a single obvious way to do anything. Python enthusiasts and programmers, then, generally prize unanimity of style over syntactic flexibility compared to those who choose Ruby, and this shows in the code they create. Even Python's whitespace-sensitive parsing has a feel of lending clarity through syntactical enforcement that is very much at odds with the much fuzzier style of typical Ruby code.
For example, Python's much-admired list comprehension feature serves as the most obvious way to build up certain kinds of lists according to initial conditions:
a = [x**3 for x in range(10,20)]
b = [y for y in a if y % 2 == 0]
first builds up a list of the cubes of all of the numbers between 10 and 19 (yes, 19), assigning the result to 'a'. A second list of those elements in 'a' which are even is then stored in 'b'. One natural way to do this in Ruby is probably:
a = (10..19).map {|x| x ** 3}
b = a.select {|y| y.even?}
but there are a number of obvious alternatives, such as:
a = (10..19).collect do |x|
x ** 3
end
b = a.find_all do |y|
y % 2 == 0
end
It tends to be a little easier to come up with equally viable, but syntactically distinct, solutions in Ruby compared to Python, even for relatively simple tasks like the above. That is not to say that Ruby is a messy language, either; it is merely that it is somewhat freer and more forgiving than Python is, and many consider Python's relative purity in this regard a real advantage when it comes to writing clear, easily understandable code.
And Somewhat One of Performance
Recently, I asked my friend, Ray, to list those he believes are the top 10 most forward thinkers in the IT industry. Below is the list he generated.
Like most smart people, Ray gets his information from institutions such as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Huffington Post, Ted Talks ... Ray is not an IT expert; he is, however, a marketer: the type that has an opinion on everything and is all too willing to share it. Unfortunately, many of his opinions are based upon the writings/editorials of those attempting to appeal to the reading level of an 8th grader. I suppose it could be worse. He could be referencing Yahoo News, where important stories get priority placement such as when the voluptuous Kate Upton holds a computer close to her breasts.
Before you read further, note that missing from this list and not credited are innovators: Bill Joy, Dennis Ritchie, Linus Torvalds, Alan Turing, Edward Howard Armstrong, Peter Andreas Grunberg and Albert Fent, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz/Hermann Grassmann ... You know the type: the type of individual who burns the midnight oil and rarely, if ever, guffaws over their discoveries or achievements.
As someone who works in many facets of the music industry, I used to seethe with a mixture of anger and jealousy when I would hear people in more “traditional” goods-based industries argue in favor of music content-based piracy. They made all the classic talking points, like “I wouldn’t spend money on this artist normally, and maybe if I like it I’ll spend money on them when they come to town” (which never happened), or “artists are rich and I’m poor, they don’t need my money” (rarely the case), or the worst, “if it were fairly priced and worth paying for, I’d buy it” (not true). I always wondered if they’d have the same attitude if 63% of the things acquired by customers in their industries weren’t actually paid for, as was conservatively estimated as the case for the music industry in 2009 (other estimations put the figure of pirated music at 95%). Well, we may soon see the answer to curiosities like that. Though one can say with tentative confidence that music piracy is on the decline thanks to services like Spotify and Rdio, it could be looming on the horizon for the entire global, physical supply chain. Yes, I’m talking about 3d printers.
Before I get into the heart of this article, let me take a moment to make one thing clear: I think these machines are incredible. It’s damn near inspiring to think of even a few of their potentially world-changing applications: affordable, perfectly fit prosthetic limbs for wounded servicemen and women; the ability to create a piece of machinery on the spot instead of having to wait for a spare to arrive in the mail, or en route if your car or ship breaks down in a far away place; a company based out of Austin, TX even made a fully functioning firearm from a 3d printer a few months ago.
If these machines become as consumer-friendly and idiot-proof as possible (like computers), it’s possible that in a matter of decades (maybe less), a majority of U.S. households will have their own 3d printer. There’s also the possibility they could take the tech-hobbyist path, one that is much less appealing to the masses. Dale Dougherty of Makezine.com estimates there are currently around 100,000 “personal” 3d printers, or those not owned for business or educational purposes. I don’t think they’ll ever be as ubiquitous as computers, but there are plenty of mechanically inclined, crafty hobbyists out there who would love to play around with a 3d printer if it was affordable enough.
That being said, is there reason to worry about the economic implications of consumers making what they want, essentially for free, instead of paying someone else to produce it? Or will the printers instead be used for unique items more so than replicating and ripping off other companies’ merchandise in mass amounts? The number of people working in industries that would be affected by a development like this is far greater than the number of people who work in content-based industries, so any downturn would probably have a much larger economic implications. Certainly, those times are a ways off, but a little foresightedness never hurt anyone!
Tech Life in California
| Company Name | City | Industry | Secondary Industry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mattel, Inc. | El Segundo | Retail | Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, and Music Stores |
| Spectrum Group International, Inc. | Irvine | Retail | Retail Other |
| Chevron Corp | San Ramon | Energy and Utilities | Gasoline and Oil Refineries |
| Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. | Pasadena | Real Estate and Construction | Construction and Remodeling |
| eBay Inc. | San Jose | Software and Internet | E-commerce and Internet Businesses |
| Broadcom Corporation | Irvine | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Franklin Templeton Investments | San Mateo | Financial Services | Investment Banking and Venture Capital |
| Pacific Life Insurance Company | Newport Beach | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
| Tutor Perini Corporation | Sylmar | Real Estate and Construction | Construction and Remodeling |
| SYNNEX Corporation | Fremont | Software and Internet | Data Analytics, Management and Storage |
| Core-Mark International Inc | South San Francisco | Manufacturing | Food and Dairy Product Manufacturing and Packaging |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Los Angeles | Manufacturing | Chemicals and Petrochemicals |
| Yahoo!, Inc. | Sunnyvale | Software and Internet | Software and Internet Other |
| Edison International | Rosemead | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
| Ingram Micro, Inc. | Santa Ana | Computers and Electronics | Consumer Electronics, Parts and Repair |
| Safeway, Inc. | Pleasanton | Retail | Grocery and Specialty Food Stores |
| Gilead Sciences, Inc. | San Mateo | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Pharmaceuticals |
| AECOM Technology Corporation | Los Angeles | Real Estate and Construction | Architecture,Engineering and Design |
| Reliance Steel and Aluminum | Los Angeles | Manufacturing | Metals Manufacturing |
| Live Nation, Inc. | Beverly Hills | Media and Entertainment | Performing Arts |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Sunnyvale | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Pacific Gas and Electric Corp | San Francisco | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
| Electronic Arts Inc. | Redwood City | Software and Internet | Games and Gaming |
| Oracle Corporation | Redwood City | Software and Internet | Software and Internet Other |
| Symantec Corporation | Mountain View | Software and Internet | Data Analytics, Management and Storage |
| Dole Food Company, Inc. | Thousand Oaks | Manufacturing | Food and Dairy Product Manufacturing and Packaging |
| CBRE Group, Inc. | Los Angeles | Real Estate and Construction | Real Estate Investment and Development |
| First American Financial Corporation | Santa Ana | Financial Services | Financial Services Other |
| The Gap, Inc. | San Francisco | Retail | Clothing and Shoes Stores |
| Ross Stores, Inc. | Pleasanton | Retail | Clothing and Shoes Stores |
| Qualcomm Incorporated | San Diego | Telecommunications | Wireless and Mobile |
| Charles Schwab Corporation | San Francisco | Financial Services | Securities Agents and Brokers |
| Sempra Energy | San Diego | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
| Western Digital Corporation | Irvine | Computers and Electronics | Consumer Electronics, Parts and Repair |
| Health Net, Inc. | Woodland Hills | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, and Biotech Other |
| Allergan, Inc. | Irvine | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Biotechnology |
| The Walt Disney Company | Burbank | Media and Entertainment | Motion Picture and Recording Producers |
| Hewlett-Packard Company | Palo Alto | Computers and Electronics | Consumer Electronics, Parts and Repair |
| URS Corporation | San Francisco | Real Estate and Construction | Architecture,Engineering and Design |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | San Jose | Computers and Electronics | Networking Equipment and Systems |
| Wells Fargo and Company | San Francisco | Financial Services | Banks |
| Intel Corporation | Santa Clara | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | Santa Clara | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Sanmina Corporation | San Jose | Computers and Electronics | Semiconductor and Microchip Manufacturing |
| Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Santa Clara | Telecommunications | Telecommunications Equipment and Accessories |
| Avery Dennison Corporation | Pasadena | Manufacturing | Paper and Paper Products |
| The Clorox Company | Oakland | Manufacturing | Chemicals and Petrochemicals |
| Apple Inc. | Cupertino | Computers and Electronics | Consumer Electronics, Parts and Repair |
| Amgen Inc | Thousand Oaks | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Biotechnology |
| McKesson Corporation | San Francisco | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Pharmaceuticals |
| DIRECTV | El Segundo | Telecommunications | Cable Television Providers |
| Visa, Inc. | San Mateo | Financial Services | Credit Cards and Related Services |
| Google, Inc. | Mountain View | Software and Internet | E-commerce and Internet Businesses |
training details locations, tags and why hsg
The Hartmann Software Group understands these issues and addresses them and others during any training engagement. Although no IT educational institution can guarantee career or application development success, HSG can get you closer to your goals at a far faster rate than self paced learning and, arguably, than the competition. Here are the reasons why we are so successful at teaching:
- Learn from the experts.
- We have provided software development and other IT related training to many major corporations in California since 2002.
- Our educators have years of consulting and training experience; moreover, we require each trainer to have cross-discipline expertise i.e. be Java and .NET experts so that you get a broad understanding of how industry wide experts work and think.
- Discover tips and tricks about Ruby Programming programming
- Get your questions answered by easy to follow, organized Ruby Programming experts
- Get up to speed with vital Ruby Programming programming tools
- Save on travel expenses by learning right from your desk or home office. Enroll in an online instructor led class. Nearly all of our classes are offered in this way.
- Prepare to hit the ground running for a new job or a new position
- See the big picture and have the instructor fill in the gaps
- We teach with sophisticated learning tools and provide excellent supporting course material
- Books and course material are provided in advance
- Get a book of your choice from the HSG Store as a gift from us when you register for a class
- Gain a lot of practical skills in a short amount of time
- We teach what we know…software
- We care…
Interesting Reads Take a class with us and receive a book of your choosing for 50% off MSRP.
