Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Training Classes in Farmington Hills, Michigan
Learn Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database in Farmington Hills, Michigan and surrounding areas via our hands-on, expert led courses. All of our classes either are offered on an onsite, online or public instructor led basis. Here is a list of our current Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database related training offerings in Farmington Hills, Michigan: Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Training
Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Training Catalog
subcategories
Cassandra Classes
Hadoop Classes
Linux Unix Classes
Microsoft Development Classes
MySQL Classes
Oracle Classes
SQL Server Classes
Course Directory [training on all levels]
- .NET Classes
- Agile/Scrum Classes
- Ajax Classes
- Android and iPhone Programming Classes
- Blaze Advisor Classes
- C Programming Classes
- C# Programming Classes
- C++ Programming Classes
- Cisco Classes
- Cloud Classes
- CompTIA Classes
- Crystal Reports Classes
- Design Patterns Classes
- DevOps Classes
- Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Classes
- Git, Jira, Wicket, Gradle, Tableau Classes
- IBM Classes
- Java Programming Classes
- JBoss Administration Classes
- JUnit, TDD, CPTC, Web Penetration Classes
- Linux Unix Classes
- Machine Learning Classes
- Microsoft Classes
- Microsoft Development Classes
- Microsoft SQL Server Classes
- Microsoft Team Foundation Server Classes
- Microsoft Windows Server Classes
- Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Classes
- Perl Programming Classes
- Python Programming Classes
- Ruby Programming Classes
- Security Classes
- SharePoint Classes
- SOA Classes
- Tcl, Awk, Bash, Shell Classes
- UML Classes
- VMWare Classes
- Web Development Classes
- Web Services Classes
- Weblogic Administration Classes
- XML Classes
- Go Language Essentials
29 July, 2024 - 1 August, 2024 - Introduction to Python 3.x
22 July, 2024 - 25 July, 2024 - Ruby on Rails
22 August, 2024 - 23 August, 2024 - Introduction to C++ for Absolute Beginners
20 May, 2024 - 21 May, 2024 - VMware vSphere 8.0 Boot Camp
10 June, 2024 - 14 June, 2024 - See our complete public course listing
Blog Entries publications that: entertain, make you think, offer insight
Evolving technologies become fun due to the immense advantages and features they bring with them. Fighting change though is human and while we may initially resist such changes, it is always better to accept them to our advantage.
Switching to HTML 5 is one such change we need to be ready for and there are at least 8 reasons why we should be doing so which are explained later in the article.
Earlier HTML was mainly used only for Web content development. But with the arrival of HTML 5, there would be a radical shift in that it would be used more and more for the development of many of the client side applications as well. The advantages straight away are that CSS as well as JavaScript become free due to the open architecture environment. HTML 5 is also pretty light and has a much easier code to read, making it convenient for devices like smart phones and tablets running on batteries to use the applications.
The 8 reasons mentioned above are as under:
Over time, companies are migrating from COBOL to the latest standard of C# solutions due to reasons such as cumbersome deployment processes, scarcity of trained developers, platform dependencies, increasing maintenance fees. Whether a company wants to migrate to reporting applications, operational infrastructure, or management support systems, shifting from COBOL to C# solutions can be time-consuming and highly risky, expensive, and complicated. However, the following four techniques can help companies reduce the complexity and risk around their modernization efforts.
All COBOL to C# Solutions are Equal
It can be daunting for a company to sift through a set of sophisticated services and tools on the market to boost their modernization efforts. Manual modernization solutions often turn into an endless nightmare while the automated ones are saturated with solutions that generate codes that are impossible to maintain and extend once the migration is over. However, your IT department can still work with tools and services and create code that is easier to manage if it wants to capitalize on technologies such as DevOps.
Narrow the Focus
Most legacy systems are incompatible with newer systems. For years now, companies have passed legacy systems to one another without considering functional relationships and proper documentation features. However, a detailed analysis of databases and legacy systems can be useful in decision-making and risk mitigation in any modernization effort. It is fairly common for companies to uncover a lot of unused and dead code when they analyze their legacy inventory carefully. Those discoveries, however can help reduce the cost involved in project implementation and the scope of COBOL to C# modernization. Research has revealed that legacy inventory analysis can result in a 40% reduction of modernization risk. Besides making the modernization effort less complex, trimming unused and dead codes and cost reduction, companies can gain a lot more from analyzing these systems.
Understand Thyself
For most companies, the legacy system entails an entanglement of intertwined code developed by former employees who long ago left the organization. The developers could apply any standards and left behind little documentation, and this made it extremely risky for a company to migrate from a COBOL to C# solution. In 2013, CIOs teamed up with other IT stakeholders in the insurance industry in the U.S to conduct a study that found that only 18% of COBOL to C# modernization projects complete within the scheduled period. Further research revealed that poor legacy application understanding was the primary reason projects could not end as expected.
Furthermore, using the accuracy of the legacy system for planning and poor understanding of the breadth of the influence of the company rules and policies within the legacy system are some of the risks associated with migrating from COBOL to C# solutions. The way an organization understands the source environment could also impact the ability to plan and implement a modernization project successfully. However, accurate, in-depth knowledge about the source environment can help reduce the chances of cost overrun since workers understand the internal operations in the migration project. That way, companies can understand how time and scope impact the efforts required to implement a plan successfully.
Use of Sequential Files
Companies often use sequential files as an intermediary when migrating from COBOL to C# solution to save data. Alternatively, sequential files can be used for report generation or communication with other programs. However, software mining doesn’t migrate these files to SQL tables; instead, it maintains them on file systems. Companies can use data generated on the COBOL system to continue to communicate with the rest of the system at no risk. Sequential files also facilitate a secure migration path to advanced standards such as MS Excel.
Modern systems offer companies a range of portfolio analysis that allows for narrowing down their scope of legacy application migration. Organizations may also capitalize on it to shed light on migration rules hidden in the ancient legacy environment. COBOL to C# modernization solution uses an extensible and fully maintainable code base to develop functional equivalent target application. Migration from COBOL solution to C# applications involves language translation, analysis of all artifacts required for modernization, system acceptance testing, and database and data transfer. While it’s optional, companies could need improvements such as coding improvements, SOA integration, clean up, screen redesign, and cloud deployment.
Millions of people experienced the frustration and failures of the Obamacare website when it first launched. Because the code for the back end is not open source, the exact technicalities of the initial failings are tricky to determine. Many curious programmers and web designers have had time to examine the open source coding on the front end, however, leading to reasonable conclusions about the nature of the overall difficulties.
Lack of End to End Collaboration
The website was developed with multiple contractors for the front-end and back-end functions. The site also needed to be integrated with insurance companies, IRS servers, Homeland Security servers, and the Department of Veterans Affairs, all of whom had their own legacy systems. The large number of parties involved and the complex nature of the various components naturally complicated the testing and integration of each portion of the project.
The errors displayed, and occasionally the lack thereof, indicated an absence of coordination between the parties developing the separate components. A failed sign up attempt, for instance, often resulted in a page that displayed the header but had no content or failure message. A look at end user requests revealed that the database was unavailable. Clearly, the coding for the front end did not include errors for failures on the back end.
Bloat and the Abundance of Minor Issues
Obviously, numerous bugs were also an issue. The system required users to create passwords that included numbers, for example, but failed to disclose that on the form and in subsequent failure messages, leaving users baffled. In another issue, one of the pages intended to ask users to please wait or call instead, but the message and the phone information were accidentally commented out in the code.
While the front-end design has been cleared of blame for the most serious failures, bloat in the code did contribute to the early difficulties users experienced. The site design was heavy with Javascript and CSS files, and it was peppered with small coding errors that became particularly troublesome when users faced bottlenecks in traffic. Frequent typos throughout the code proved to be an additional embarrassment and were another indication of a troubled development process.
NoSQL Database
The NoSQL database is intended to allow for scalability and flexibility in the architecture of projects that will use it. This made NoSQL a logical choice for the health insurance exchange website. The newness of the technology, however, means personnel with expertise can be elusive. Database-related missteps were more likely the result of a lack of experienced administrators than with the technology itself. The choice of the NoSQL database was thus another complication in the development, but did not itself cause the failures.
Another factor of consequence is that the website was built with both agile and waterfall methodology elements. With agile methods for the front end and the waterfall methodology for the back end, streamlining was naturally going to suffer further difficulties. The disparate contractors, varied methods of software development, and an unrealistically short project time line all contributed to the coding failures of the website.
Here is a list of the organizations that use Python. This list is periodically updated by HSG’s software fans as well as the community at large.
Web Development
1. Yahoo Maps
Yahoo acquired Four11, whose address and mapping lookup services were implemented in Python. Yahoo Maps still uses Python today, as can be seen by examining its URLs.
2. Yahoo Groups
A comprehensive public archive of Internet mailing lists that was originally implemented in pure Python. At one point Scott Hassan, one of the founders of Findmail/eGroups (the company that was later acquired by Yahoo), reported that they had 180,000 lines of Python underlying everything from their 100% dynamic website to all email delivery, pumping out 200 messages/second on a single 400 MHz Pentium.
Tech Life in Michigan
Company Name | City | Industry | Secondary Industry |
---|---|---|---|
Lear Corporation | Southfield | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. | Livonia | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
Spartan Stores, Inc. | Byron Center | Retail | Grocery and Specialty Food Stores |
Steelcase Inc. | Grand Rapids | Manufacturing | Furniture Manufacturing |
Valassis Communications, Inc. | Livonia | Business Services | Advertising, Marketing and PR |
Autoliv, Inc. | Auburn Hills | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
Cooper-Standard Automotive Group | Novi | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | Bloomfield Hills | Retail | Automobile Dealers |
Con-Way Inc. | Ann Arbor | Transportation and Storage | Freight Hauling (Rail and Truck) |
Meritor, Inc. | Troy | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
Visteon Corporation | Van Buren Twp | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
Affinia Group, Inc. | Ann Arbor | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
Perrigo Company | Allegan | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Pharmaceuticals |
BorgWarner Inc. | Auburn Hills | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
Auto-Owners Insurance | Lansing | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
DTE Energy Company | Detroit | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
Whirlpool Corporation | Benton Harbor | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
Herman Miller, Inc. | Zeeland | Manufacturing | Furniture Manufacturing |
Universal Forest Products | Grand Rapids | Manufacturing | Furniture Manufacturing |
Masco Corporation Inc. | Taylor | Manufacturing | Concrete, Glass, and Building Materials |
PULTEGROUP, INC. | Bloomfield Hills | Real Estate and Construction | Real Estate & Construction Other |
CMS Energy Corporation | Jackson | Energy and Utilities | Energy and Utilities Other |
Stryker Corporation | Portage | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Medical Devices |
General Motors Company (GM) | Detroit | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
Kellogg Company | Battle Creek | Manufacturing | Food and Dairy Product Manufacturing and Packaging |
The Dow Chemical Company | Midland | Manufacturing | Chemicals and Petrochemicals |
Kelly Services, Inc. | Troy | Business Services | HR and Recruiting Services |
Ford Motor Company | Dearborn | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
training details locations, tags and why hsg
The Hartmann Software Group understands these issues and addresses them and others during any training engagement. Although no IT educational institution can guarantee career or application development success, HSG can get you closer to your goals at a far faster rate than self paced learning and, arguably, than the competition. Here are the reasons why we are so successful at teaching:
- Learn from the experts.
- We have provided software development and other IT related training to many major corporations in Michigan since 2002.
- Our educators have years of consulting and training experience; moreover, we require each trainer to have cross-discipline expertise i.e. be Java and .NET experts so that you get a broad understanding of how industry wide experts work and think.
- Discover tips and tricks about Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database programming
- Get your questions answered by easy to follow, organized Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database experts
- Get up to speed with vital Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database programming tools
- Save on travel expenses by learning right from your desk or home office. Enroll in an online instructor led class. Nearly all of our classes are offered in this way.
- Prepare to hit the ground running for a new job or a new position
- See the big picture and have the instructor fill in the gaps
- We teach with sophisticated learning tools and provide excellent supporting course material
- Books and course material are provided in advance
- Get a book of your choice from the HSG Store as a gift from us when you register for a class
- Gain a lot of practical skills in a short amount of time
- We teach what we know…software
- We care…